Perplexity vs ChatGPT
The citation-first answer engine versus the all-purpose AI powerhouse. Both cost $20/month at the mid tier. Both want to replace Google. One definitive comparison for 2026.
TL;DR — The Quick Verdict
- Perplexity is a retrieval-first answer engine built from the ground up for real-time web search with inline citations — best for research, fact-checking, and anyone who needs verifiable answers fast.
- ChatGPT is a generation-first conversational AI with an enormous feature surface — search, image generation, voice mode, coding, agents, and a plugin ecosystem — ideal as an all-purpose AI assistant.
- In independent benchmarks, Perplexity achieved 92% factual accuracy on real-time queries versus ChatGPT’s 87%, with a citation error rate nearly half that of ChatGPT Search.
- ChatGPT dwarfs Perplexity in scale: 900 million weekly active users and $2 billion/month in revenue, compared to Perplexity’s 100 million MAUs and ~$450M ARR.
- Power users increasingly run both tools together: Perplexity for the research and verification phase, ChatGPT for the creation and execution phase.
Answer Engine vs. Universal AI Assistant
The AI landscape in 2026 has fractured into specializations — and the divide between Perplexity and ChatGPT captures the most important split in the industry. These tools share superficial similarities — both answer questions, both can search the web, both cost $20/month at their core paid tier — but their architectures, philosophies, and optimal use cases couldn’t be more different.
Perplexity is retrieval-first. Every response begins with a live web search across an index of 50 billion+ pages. The AI synthesizes findings and presents them with inline citations — numbered references you can click to verify every claim. It was conceived as an “answer engine,” a term its founders use deliberately to distinguish it from both traditional search engines (which return links) and chatbots (which generate text from training data). Think of Perplexity as a research librarian who always shows their sources.
ChatGPT is generation-first. Its foundation is a massive language model — currently GPT-5.4 for Plus subscribers — optimized to produce original content, reason through complex problems, write code, generate images, hold voice conversations, and, yes, search the web when needed. Web search in ChatGPT is an added capability, not the core architecture. Think of ChatGPT as a versatile assistant who can also look things up.
— Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity (2025)
This fundamental difference — retrieval-first versus generation-first — shapes everything: how each tool handles citations, where each excels, and why the most sophisticated users in 2026 often use both.
From Research Labs to the Search Wars
Perplexity — The Answer Engine
Perplexity AI was founded in August 2022 by Aravind Srinivas, Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, and Andy Konwinski — engineers with backgrounds spanning OpenAI, Google Brain, DeepMind, and Databricks. Srinivas, a UC Berkeley PhD in computer science from Chennai, India, had worked at OpenAI on language and diffusion models before deciding that the real opportunity wasn’t in building bigger models — it was in building better search.
The main product launched on December 7, 2022 — just five days after ChatGPT — and immediately differentiated itself with source attribution. While ChatGPT was captivating the world with conversational fluency, Perplexity bet that verifiability would ultimately matter more than eloquence.
Growth was methodical, then explosive. Seed funding from NEA and Databricks got things started. A $73.6M Series B in early 2024 valued the company at $520M. By September 2025, a $200M round at a $20B valuation signaled that Perplexity was being taken seriously as a Google competitor. The Series E-6 round in January 2026 pushed valuation to $21.21 billion, with total funding exceeding $1.5 billion from investors including Accel, NVIDIA, SoftBank, and Jeff Bezos.
Srinivas debuted on India’s Rich List in October 2025 with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion, becoming India’s youngest billionaire at 31.
ChatGPT — The AI That Changed Everything
ChatGPT needs less introduction. Launched on November 30, 2022 by OpenAI — the company co-founded by Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, and others in 2015 — it became the fastest-growing consumer application in history, hitting 100 million users within two months. It didn’t just popularize conversational AI; it defined the category.
OpenAI’s trajectory since then has been staggering. Revenue grew from $2 billion in 2023 to $6 billion in 2024 to $20 billion in 2025. By February 2026, the company was generating $2 billion per month, pushing annualized revenue past $25 billion. Weekly active users reached 900 million, with over 50 million paying subscribers.
In March 2026, OpenAI closed a $122 billion funding round at a post-money valuation of $852 billion, with an IPO widely expected in late 2026 or early 2027. Internal projections target $280 billion in annual revenue by 2030.
The scale difference is staggering. OpenAI’s monthly revenue alone exceeds Perplexity’s entire annual revenue. Yet Perplexity is growing at 354% year-over-year — far faster than OpenAI’s rate — and carving out a differentiated position that big scale alone cannot replicate.
What Each Tool
Actually Does
| Feature | Perplexity | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Core paradigm | Real-time search + synthesis with citations | Conversational AI + multi-modal assistant |
| Web search | Native; every query searches 50B+ page index | Integrated; ChatGPT Search via Bing index |
| Inline citations | Always present, numbered with click-to-verify | Available when browsing; sometimes omitted |
| Image generation | Available (Pro/Max via DALL-E, Flux) | DALL-E native + Sora video |
| Voice mode | Available (via GPT Realtime 1.5) | Advanced Voice + CarPlay integration |
| Code execution | Limited (API-focused) | Full sandbox, Code Interpreter, Codex agent |
| Deep Research | Sonar Deep Research — hundreds of sources | Deep Research (10 runs/month on Plus) |
| Multi-model access | 19 models (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, etc.) | GPT-5.3, GPT-5.4, o3, o4-mini |
| Agent capabilities | Perplexity Computer (19-model orchestration) | Codex agent, Agent Mode, GPTs ecosystem |
| Writing workspace | Pages (shareable research articles) | Prism (LaTeX), Canvas (writing & code) |
| Browser product | Comet browser (iOS, Android, desktop) | Chrome extension, mobile apps |
| Developer API | Sonar family (search, reasoning, deep research) | GPT-5.4 API, Assistants, Codex, Embeddings |
| Memory / context | Collections (organize research threads) | Memory across conversations, ~320 pages context |
| Custom GPTs / plugins | No | Thousands of custom GPTs and integrations |
The pattern is clear: Perplexity wins on search quality, citations, real-time accuracy, and multi-model flexibility. ChatGPT wins on breadth — image generation, voice, coding, plugins, and the sheer size of its ecosystem. Neither tool renders the other obsolete.
Perplexity:
The Answer Engine Reimagined
Perplexity’s core value proposition is deceptively simple: ask a question, get an answer with sources. But underneath that simplicity lies a sophisticated architecture that, in 2026, has expanded far beyond basic search into a multi-layered AI platform.
The Search Engine That Cites Everything
Every Perplexity query begins with a real-time web search across an index exceeding 50 billion pages. The system retrieves relevant sources, synthesizes the information using AI, and presents the answer with numbered inline citations. This isn’t optional formatting — it’s the core architecture. You cannot get a Perplexity response without sources, because the sources are what generate the response.
Pro Search goes deeper, executing multi-step reasoning: breaking complex queries into sub-questions, searching independently for each, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive answer. Free users get approximately 5 Pro Search queries per day; Pro and Max subscribers get unlimited access.
Multi-Model Intelligence
One of Perplexity’s most underappreciated advantages is its model diversity. While ChatGPT is locked into OpenAI’s own models, Perplexity routes queries to the best model for the job. The Perplexity Computer agent, launched in February 2026, orchestrates 19 different AI models simultaneously — including Claude Opus for orchestration, Google Gemini for deep research, xAI’s Grok for speed, and GPT-5.2 for long-context recall.
— Aravind Srinivas, explaining Perplexity’s multi-model approach (Fortune, February 2026)
The Comet Browser
Perplexity’s most ambitious product launch of 2026 is Comet — a full standalone web browser available on iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac since March 2026. Comet integrates AI directly into browsing: a context-aware assistant that knows which tab you’re on, Deep Research integration, voice mode, and multi-step agentic task automation. It hit #3 on the US App Store at launch.
The API Platform
For developers, Perplexity offers the Sonar model family via API — specialized models for different search depths: Sonar for lightweight queries, Sonar Pro for deeper context with 2x more search results, Sonar Reasoning Pro for chain-of-thought analytical tasks, and Sonar Deep Research for long-form synthesis across hundreds of sources. As of March 2026, structured JSON outputs are available across all tiers.
ChatGPT:
The Everything Machine
ChatGPT’s strategy in 2026 is unambiguous: be the single AI interface for everything. Writing, coding, searching, creating images, having voice conversations, analyzing data, running agents, building custom tools — OpenAI wants ChatGPT to be the first app you open every morning and the last one you close at night.
The Model Lineup
ChatGPT Plus subscribers in 2026 get access to GPT-5.4 — OpenAI’s most capable frontier model, unifying advances in reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows. For reasoning-heavy tasks, o3 and o4-mini thinking models are available. Free users get the slightly older GPT-5.3. The Pro tier ($200/month) provides maximum access, priority during peak times, and extended reasoning.
ChatGPT Search
Launched as “SearchGPT” in late 2024 and fully integrated into ChatGPT, the search feature lets users ask questions in natural language and receive web-sourced answers with citations. It’s powered by Bing’s index and supports real-time information. ChatGPT Search is a direct response to Perplexity’s core value proposition — but it’s an add-on feature rather than the foundational architecture, which means citations are sometimes present and sometimes absent.
Prism & Canvas
Prism, launched in January 2026, is a free LaTeX-native workspace for scientists, deeply integrated with GPT-5.2. It handles document editing, compilation, citation management, and AI-assisted revision in a single environment — targeting the academic market that Perplexity’s Pages feature was beginning to capture.
Canvas is ChatGPT’s collaborative writing and coding workspace, enabling side-by-side editing with the AI. Together with Prism, these tools transform ChatGPT from a chat interface into a full productivity suite.
Agents, Codex, and the Ecosystem
Codex, powered by GPT-5.3-Codex, is one of the most capable agentic coding tools available — handling not just code generation but full computer-use tasks for developers and professionals. Agent Mode enables ChatGPT to take autonomous multi-step actions. The Custom GPTs marketplace provides thousands of specialized tools created by the community. And Advanced Voice Mode with CarPlay integration turns ChatGPT into a hands-free personal assistant.
What You Pay,
What You Get
| Tier | Perplexity | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Unlimited basic search, ~5 Pro Search/day, no advanced models | GPT-5.3, limited messages, limited image gen, ads in US |
| $8/mo | — | Go: More messages, GPT-5.3, basic features |
| $20/mo | Pro: Unlimited Pro Search, advanced models, image gen, API access | Plus: GPT-5.4 Thinking, Deep Research (10/mo), Sora, Codex, Agent Mode |
| $200/mo | Max: Perplexity Computer, 19 models, agentic workflows | Pro: Max access, priority, extended reasoning, unlimited Deep Research |
| Enterprise | $40/user/mo — team admin, SSO, usage analytics | ~$60/user/mo (negotiable) — full workspace, admin, compliance |
| Annual discount | ~17% savings ($200/yr for Pro) | Available on select tiers |
At the $20/month sweet spot, you’re choosing between fundamentally different value propositions. Perplexity Pro gives you the best AI search experience available — unlimited deep searches with citations, access to multiple AI models, and real-time information. ChatGPT Plus gives you the widest feature set — advanced reasoning, image and video generation, voice mode, code execution, and a growing agent ecosystem.
At the $200/month tier, the gap is more nuanced. Perplexity Max’s 19-model orchestration is genuinely novel, while ChatGPT Pro’s extended reasoning and unlimited Deep Research serve power users who push the model to its limits. Both are hard to justify unless AI is central to your daily work.
The Truth Gap:
Who Gets It Right?
For many users, this section is the one that matters most. In an era of AI hallucinations and misinformation, the question isn’t just “which tool gives better answers” — it’s “which tool can I trust?”
Factual Accuracy
In an April 2026 evaluation by independent AI research group LMSYS, Perplexity Pro achieved a 92% factual accuracy rate on real-time information queries, compared to ChatGPT’s 87% with browsing enabled. A separate audit by Scale AI in late 2025 found similar results: Perplexity at 91.3%, ChatGPT at 84.7%.
The gap widens dramatically on time-sensitive queries. On stock-related questions, Perplexity scored 94% accuracy versus ChatGPT’s 81% — primarily because Perplexity’s web index updates in near real-time, while ChatGPT’s browsing relies on Bing’s index with a slight delay.
Citation Quality
Citations tell an even starker story. Perplexity tied every claim to a specific source in 78% of complex research questions, compared to ChatGPT’s 62%. A Columbia Journalism Review benchmark study found an even wider gap: Perplexity had the lowest citation error rate among major AI tools at 37%, compared to 67% for ChatGPT Search.
Who Should Use What — And When
The most productive approach in 2026 isn’t choosing one tool over the other — it’s understanding which tool excels at which task and using both strategically. Here’s how each tool maps to common use cases.
Where Perplexity Wins
- Academic and professional research: Multi-step queries with full source attribution. Pro Search breaks complex questions into sub-questions and cross-references findings.
- Fact-checking and verification: Every claim comes with a clickable citation. Ideal for journalists, analysts, and anyone who needs to verify information.
- Real-time information: Stock prices, breaking news, sports scores, event details. Perplexity’s near real-time index beats ChatGPT’s Bing-dependent search.
- Competitive analysis: Compare products, services, or companies with up-to-date data and transparent sourcing.
- Medical and legal preliminary research: When you need AI answers grounded in verifiable published sources, not model-generated guesses.
Where ChatGPT Wins
- Creative writing: Blog posts, marketing copy, fiction, brainstorming. GPT-5.4’s generation quality surpasses Perplexity’s search-optimized outputs.
- Software development: Codex agent, Code Interpreter, and Agent Mode create a full development environment inside the chat.
- Image and video creation: DALL-E for images, Sora for video. Perplexity has basic image generation; ChatGPT has a creative studio.
- Data analysis: Upload a spreadsheet, and ChatGPT’s Code Interpreter writes Python to analyze, chart, and present findings.
- Voice interactions: Advanced Voice Mode with CarPlay makes ChatGPT a hands-free assistant for commutes, walks, and multitasking.
- Custom workflows: Custom GPTs let you build specialized tools. No equivalent exists in Perplexity’s ecosystem.
Perplexity
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Perplexity
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Scale, Reach,
and Network Effects
In platform businesses, community size matters — not just for vanity metrics, but because larger communities create better products through feedback loops, shared knowledge, and ecosystem development.
ChatGPT’s Dominant Position
With 900 million weekly active users and over 50 million paying subscribers, ChatGPT is the most widely used AI product in history. More than 5.35 billion monthly visits to chatgpt.com. Over 9 million paying business users. The Custom GPTs marketplace has created a third-party ecosystem that generates genuine utility — specialized tools for everything from tax preparation to recipe generation to academic tutoring. In the United States alone, ChatGPT has an estimated 77.2 million monthly active users.
Perplexity’s Growing Base
Perplexity’s 100 million monthly active users is impressive for a company less than four years old, but it’s roughly one-ninth of ChatGPT’s reach. The company reports “tens of thousands” of enterprise customers and has seen significant traction in professional research communities — journalism, academia, finance, and legal. The Comet browser launch in March 2026 represents an ambitious play to expand beyond search into daily browsing habits.
ChatGPT’s ecosystem advantage is formidable. Custom GPTs, a massive developer API community, integrations with Microsoft products, and now the Prism scientific workspace create network effects that are difficult for Perplexity to replicate. However, Perplexity’s focused community of researchers and professionals may prove more valuable per user than ChatGPT’s broader but shallower engagement.
The Copyright Cloud Over AI Search
No comparison of Perplexity and ChatGPT in 2026 would be complete without addressing the legal firestorm that has engulfed AI search — and Perplexity in particular.
Perplexity’s Publisher Lawsuits
Perplexity faces a growing wave of copyright litigation from major publishers. The New York Times sued in December 2025 in the Southern District of New York, alleging that Perplexity unlawfully scrapes Times stories, videos, podcasts, and other content to formulate user responses. The complaint details a two-stage infringement process where Perplexity’s crawlers — “PerplexityBot” and “Perplexity-User” — ignored robots.txt directives and circumvented hard blocks implemented by the newspaper.
The Times is far from alone. News Corp (Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, New York Post), the Chicago Tribune, Nikkei, Asahi Shimbun, and even Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster have brought similar claims. Forbes and Wired have publicly accused Perplexity of plagiarism and unethical scraping of content from sites that explicitly opted out of crawling.
— The New York Times copyright complaint, December 2025
OpenAI’s Own Legal Challenges
OpenAI is not immune to copyright concerns. The company faces its own lawsuit from The New York Times (filed December 2023), along with actions from authors, visual artists, and musicians. However, the nature of the claims differs: ChatGPT’s controversies center on training data (what the model learned from), while Perplexity’s center on output attribution (what the product displays to users). For Perplexity — a product literally built on summarizing and presenting web content — the accusation that it replaces the need to visit source websites is existentially threatening.
The Revenue-Sharing Experiment
To its credit, Perplexity has attempted to address publisher concerns with a revenue-sharing program, offering publishers a cut of ad revenue when their content is cited. But as Fortune noted: “Perplexity wants to play nice with publishers. They keep suing it anyway.” The fundamental tension — an AI that summarizes web content well enough that users don’t click through to the source — may not have a clean resolution.
The Bigger Picture:
AI Search in 2026
Perplexity and ChatGPT don’t exist in a vacuum. The AI search and assistant market in 2026 is one of the most competitive landscapes in technology, with Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, and others all vying for the same user attention.
Google’s AI Mode
Google’s AI Mode — integrated directly into Google Search — represents the biggest competitive threat to both Perplexity and ChatGPT. With Google’s unmatched search index, distribution advantages, and billions of daily users, AI Mode doesn’t need to be the best product — it just needs to be good enough. Independent benchmarks show Perplexity still producing better search results than both ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, but Google’s distribution advantage is enormous.
The Convergence Trend
The most significant market trend is convergence. Perplexity is adding generation features (image creation, the Computer agent, Comet browser). ChatGPT is adding search features (ChatGPT Search, Deep Research, citations). Google is adding conversational AI to search. Every product is moving toward the same destination: an AI that can both find information and create content, with transparent sourcing.
The question isn’t which product will survive — it’s whether the market will reward the search specialist (Perplexity), the generalist (ChatGPT), or the incumbent with distribution (Google). History suggests all three will coexist, much as Chrome, Safari, and Firefox coexist in browsers, or Slack, Teams, and Discord coexist in messaging.
— Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, to Aravind Srinivas after Perplexity’s Deep Research launch (February 2025)
The friendly-yet-competitive dynamic between Altman and Srinivas captures the market perfectly. These aren’t products trying to destroy each other — they’re products that respect each other’s strengths while competing fiercely for user attention and market share.
So… Which One
Should You Use?
After thousands of words of analysis, the honest answer is nuanced — because these tools serve fundamentally different needs despite their surface similarity.
The Best Answer: Use Both
The most efficient workflow in 2026 — and this is the recommendation we keep hearing from power users across industries — combines both tools: Perplexity for the search and verification phase, ChatGPT for the creation and execution phase.
Research a topic in Perplexity. Verify the facts. Collect the sources. Then switch to ChatGPT to draft the content, generate the visuals, write the code, or build the presentation. This workflow gives you Perplexity’s accuracy and ChatGPT’s creative power, and it costs $40/month total — less than most professionals spend on coffee.
Perplexity
Perplexity
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Tie
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Perplexity more accurate than ChatGPT?
Yes, for search-related queries. Independent benchmarks from LMSYS (April 2026) show Perplexity achieving 92% factual accuracy on real-time queries versus ChatGPT’s 87%. The gap widens for time-sensitive topics like financial data (94% vs. 81%). Perplexity also has a significantly lower citation error rate (37% vs. 67% per Columbia Journalism Review). However, for non-search tasks like creative writing or code generation, accuracy isn’t the relevant metric — and ChatGPT’s generation quality is generally superior.
Can I use Perplexity and ChatGPT together?
Absolutely, and many power users recommend this approach. The most efficient workflow combines Perplexity for the research and verification phase — finding information, checking facts, collecting cited sources — and ChatGPT for the creation and execution phase — drafting content, generating images, writing code, or analyzing data. At $40/month combined ($20 each for Pro/Plus), this gives you the best of both worlds.
Which is better for students and academic research?
Perplexity is generally the better choice for academic work because of its inline citations and source attribution. Every claim is tied to a verifiable source, making it easier to build bibliographies and fact-check findings. Perplexity’s Pro Search can break complex research questions into sub-questions and cross-reference multiple sources. However, ChatGPT’s Prism workspace (a free LaTeX editor integrated with GPT-5.2) is excellent for writing scientific papers, and its Code Interpreter is invaluable for data analysis assignments.
Does ChatGPT have web search now?
Yes. ChatGPT Search (formerly SearchGPT) is fully integrated into ChatGPT for all users, including the free tier. It can browse the web in real time and return cited answers. However, its search relies on Bing’s index with a slight delay, and its citation consistency is lower than Perplexity’s. ChatGPT Search works well for basic queries but doesn’t match Perplexity’s depth on complex, multi-step research questions.
What is Perplexity’s Comet browser?
Comet is Perplexity’s standalone web browser, launched in March 2026 for iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac. It integrates AI directly into browsing with a context-aware assistant that knows which tab you’re on, Deep Research integration, voice mode, and multi-step agentic task automation. It reached #3 on the US App Store at launch. Think of it as a web browser where Perplexity’s AI is the default way you interact with every website.
Is ChatGPT free tier still worth using?
Yes, but with caveats. The free tier provides access to GPT-5.3, limited messages, limited image generation, and limited Deep Research. It’s a capable model for basic tasks. However, since February 2026, free users in the US see ads, which some find intrusive. If you want ad-free access and more features, the Go tier at $8/month or Plus at $20/month are better options.
What AI models does Perplexity use?
Perplexity uses a multi-model approach, which is one of its key differentiators. The Perplexity Computer agent orchestrates 19 different AI models including Claude Opus for orchestration and coding, Google Gemini for deep research, xAI’s Grok for speed on lightweight tasks, GPT-5.2 for long-context recall, and others for specialized functions like image generation and video. Pro subscribers can also access Perplexity’s proprietary Sonar model family optimized for search tasks.
Why is Perplexity being sued by publishers?
Multiple publishers — including The New York Times, News Corp (WSJ, NY Post), Chicago Tribune, Nikkei, and others — have sued Perplexity for copyright infringement. They allege that Perplexity’s crawlers scrape their content while ignoring robots.txt directives, and that the AI generates responses “identical or substantially similar” to their original content. The core tension: Perplexity’s value proposition of summarizing web content with citations may reduce the need for users to visit the original sources, potentially undermining publishers’ traffic and revenue. Perplexity has offered a revenue-sharing program, but lawsuits continue.
Which tool is better for coding?
ChatGPT, by a wide margin. With Code Interpreter for running Python in-session, the Codex agent (powered by GPT-5.3-Codex) for autonomous development workflows, and Agent Mode for multi-step coding tasks, ChatGPT is a full development environment. Perplexity can answer questions about coding concepts and find documentation, but it lacks native code execution and the depth of coding-specific features that ChatGPT offers.
How do the $200/month tiers compare?
Perplexity Max ($200/month) gives you access to the Perplexity Computer agent with 19-model orchestration, unlimited Pro Search, and all premium features. ChatGPT Pro ($200/month) provides maximum access to GPT-5.4, unlimited Deep Research, extended reasoning, and priority during peak times. Perplexity Max is more novel with its multi-model approach; ChatGPT Pro is more about removing limits on an already broad feature set. Both are difficult to justify unless AI is central to your daily professional workflow.
Ready to Try Both?
Both Perplexity and ChatGPT offer generous free tiers. Start with Perplexity for your next research project and ChatGPT for your next creative task — you’ll quickly discover which tool fits each part of your workflow.
The Perplexity vs. ChatGPT debate isn’t a winner-take-all contest. It’s a specialization story. Perplexity has proven that a search-first AI with transparent citations can carve out a $21 billion position even against the $852 billion incumbent. ChatGPT has proven that breadth, scale, and ecosystem effects create a product that 900 million people use every week.
The real winner? Users. In 2026, you have access to AI tools that would have seemed science fiction three years ago — and the best approach is to use each tool for what it does best. Research with Perplexity. Create with ChatGPT. Verify everything.
